Las Vegas Web Design Blog | The Web Squad

Google has recently released a new project in their Labs known as Google Follow Finder.  The main purpose of this tool is to help users find more Tweeps to expand their network.

The tool is actually very easy to use.  All you need to do is enter a Twitter username and hit “Search”.  Follow Finder will then display users with similar followers and users that entered username might be interested in following based on “following” and “follower” lists.

And to connect with those displayed is easy.  All one needs to do is click the Follow button, log in, and they will be added.  Follow Finder is taking advantage of the new @anywhere framework recently released by Twitter.  The framework makes the entire tool possible by letting Follow Finder get dynamic information about the entered username.

To check out the tool go to http://www.followfinder.googlelabs.com

In order to communicate effectively to all of one’s social networking friends, one would need to have a profile on each social site and then post to each one of those separately.  One would also have to check each profile separately to get any answers, questions, or comments at each site.  This process is very time-consuming and keeping track of every site is a nightmare.

Ideas have come up about decentralizing social networks.  Technology has already surfaced to do this; it is called Salmon.  What Salmon does is rather simple.  Suppose Facebook and Twitter implemented Salmon.  If person A posts a tweet on Twitter, person B could respond to it from Facebook, without even having a Twitter account.  Person A could then respond to that post from Twitter and person B would see it in their Facebook.  The same decentralization process happened to email.  Everyone has email accounts on different sites like Gmail or Hotmail.  Person A can send an email from a Gmail account to person B with a Hotmail account without person A having to worry about having a Hotmail account.

What could this mean for the future of businesses in social networking?  First, it would increase the ease of communication between itself and clients/customers.  However, a business would still have to have an account in order to have a tangible presence on each social networking site.  Salmon just makes it easier to contact people on all of them, without having to worry about signing into a different account every time.  This increase in communication could lead to a better following and even better conversion rates as people would see the company has a strong presence in the social media world.

On March 9, Google opened the Google Apps Marketplace, where apps can be used with Google Apps and are sold to help businesses and users. Here is the description of the Marketplace from Google:

“The Google Apps Marketplace offers products and services designed for Google users, including installable apps that integrate directly with Google Apps.  Installable apps are easy to use because they include single sign-on, Google’s universal navigation, and some even include features that integrate with your domain’s data.”

Google Market Apps

With the opening of the marketplace, it seems Google is moving further and further towards the cloud and away from the desktop.  This does go with Google’s train of thought, as one of the executives from there recently stated that desktops will be obsolete in 3 years.  Only one questions remains, will there be a competitor that can match what Google is doing?

With Yahoo and Bing recently getting the approval for a sort of merge, one would hope that they could crawl from behind and give Google a run for its money.  But with many different apps being pushed out by Google, it will be very tough for this to happen.  We shall see what the future holds for the search engines.

Google’s social search is beginning to make its appearance on search result pages. Social media sites including Twitter and blogging sites can now be used as a search result depending on how well connected the person who is searching is connected to those sites. For example, if a person searches for something, the usual websites will still show up, but suppose that person’s friend writes a blog about whatever the person searched for. That blog page will be included in the social search results.

For businesses, this could prove to be very useful in order to get their site’s visibility increased. There are some tips that a business should follow when trying to capitalize on social search:

1. Make sure to have as many connections as possible.

Having a lot of connections makes sure that a business’s site will be seen by more people in the social search results.

2. Make it easy for customers to follow through the social networks.

This means having links on a site that will either automatically make them follow the business or go directly to the business’s social media page.

3. Post content on those social media sites for interaction with potential and current customers.

Letting a Facebook page sit there won’t do anything but hurt the business. Businesses should answer any questions that come up and post relevant content to keep the people engaged.

4. All social network info should be included on business cards, signs, and online advertising.

This is important to get future clients involved in the network. That way once they start to follow the business, need a service, and search for it, the business will be a search result, possibly ahead of competition.

Remember, traditional SEO is still important. Users might not understand how to see those social results and therefore would still rely on those organic results. These social search tips are still useful in pulling ahead of local competition.

Social Networks

Reports say that the average time spent on social networking sites in the United States is over 6 hours in 1 month with over 140 million unique visitors (http://www.nielsen.com/). Companies of all sizes want to take advantage of the amount of traffic on these sites.

But with the number of social sites growing at a fast pace, how should a company approach their social networking strategy? Should a company try to make a profile on every single site in hopes of attracting some from each, or put the focus on the most popular sites and optimize their profiles there?

Let’s compare the two choices. For the quantity approach, while the traffic going to a company’s profile per site may be low, the fact that one could have lots of profiles spread out means that the traffic could match those who only have a few profiles. But is that traffic really worth it?

The quality of these profiles might not match what one could do when focused, and therefore might not attract the right kind of consumer. People may think one is only doing half the work to keep their profile up to date and might not give the traffic any reason to follow the link to the site.

Now, as for the quality approach, traffic might really enjoy coming to one’s profile page and actually read the content that is posted. The conversion rate might be higher due to the professionalism of one’s page. Optimizing for those popular sites would also prove useful as any visitors to one’s page might reference it to their friends. Those references will not happen on the quantity approach.

The major difference that can be seen between these two approaches is the kind of traffic that will be driven to a site. Through the quantity approach, a lot of random traffic may be driven to a company’s site, but what will the bounce rate be of that traffic, or how many people will actually stay? Due to quality of one’s profile, relevant traffic will be pushed to a company’s site, almost guaranteeing a lower bounce rate. Any company should see an improvement if the time it takes to build profiles on other sites is put towards optimizing the profile on the most popular site.